[Issue 270] Compiler allows and crashes on typedefs of "immediate"-function types
Bruno Medeiros
brunodomedeirosATgmail at SPAM.com
Tue Aug 15 16:06:28 PDT 2006
Walter Bright wrote:
> d-bugmail at puremagic.com wrote:
>> Static arrays (as the first example) now work correctly, but there is
>> still the
>> same bug with dynamic arrays. (Associative Arrays seem to work
>> correctly.)
>
> Please do not reopen bugs that are fixed. If the bug example works, then
> it is fixed. If a new example fails, then it is a new bug, not an old one.
Hum, I was wondering about that, but then what constitutes a new and
"old" example?
In other words, what are the example(s) that are part of the current bug?:
Just the one(s) in the description (with possible erratas)?
Or any example presented *before* an issue is marked as resolved? And if
so, do examples where the code is not listed inline but instead is
linked to an external location (such as DStress link) count as well?
I ask this for future reference, and to know what should be done with
bugs 209 and 80:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=209
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80
--
Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list