[Issue 206] attributes private, package, etc appear to be ignored

[Derek Parnell]

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:37:59 +1000, kris <foo at bar.com> wrote:

> d-bugmail at puremagic.com wrote:
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=206
>>   someidiot at earthlink.net changed:
>>             What    |Removed                     |Added
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>              Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
>>          Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |
>>     ------- Comment #3 from someidiot at earthlink.net  2006-06-19 13:33  
>> -------
>> This is *not* a duplicate of #48 -- read the descriptions carefully. #48
>> actually has the basic visibility operable and enabled (in march 2006),  
>> but
>> allows one to step around visibility by fully qualifiying. Since then,  
>> the
>> basic visibility mechanism has broken down completely.
>>
>
>
> It's somewhat annoying when someone goes in and starts removing active  
> bug reports; especially when they apparently don't even understand the  
> problem described. This kind of behaviour tends to dissuade the  
> submission of reports in the first place.
>
> What can be done about this sort of thing?
>
The fundanmental rule about closing bug reports is that they an *ONLY* be  
closed by the person who raised them. This is because they are the ones  
that need to be satisfied.

Education about Product Support must be increased and this is slowly  
happening here.


-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia