seg-v in 4 lines (DMD 0.160 Linux/XP)

[Thomas Kuehne]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

BCS schrieb am 2006-06-29:
> Thomas Kuehne wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Added to DStress as
>> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/s/switch_22_A.d
>> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/s/switch_22_B.d
>> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/s/switch_22_C.d
>> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/s/switch_22_D.d
>> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/s/switch_22_E.d
>> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/s/switch_22_F.d
>> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/s/switch_22_G.d
>> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/s/switch_22_I.d
>> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/s/switch_22_J.d
>> 
>
> "It is illegal for a GotoStatement to be used to skip initializations."
>
> How does this effect the legality of these test cases. For that matter 
> how do I determine if a test case is considered to be legal?

legal:
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/

illegal:
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/norun/

Those in http://dstress.kuehne.cn/complex/ are "complex" tests.

> I would expect that "A" would be illegal because of this.
Fixed.

> I think that the actions of the rest are not specified.
Replace scope with writefln("activate scope X"); and analyse again.

Thomas




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFEpN5U3w+/yD4P9tIRAlLTAKCd2CG5xMbjRspuWbxVi/LSC4OvcgCbBnmF
oMUvbqKvKJassPUPMaEHh3g=
=PNrH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----