***** D method override mechanisms borked ******

[Bruno Medeiros]

I agree this whole discussion may have blown a bit out of proportion and 
usefulness. I don't mind dropping the discussion, that is except for the 
following quoted point.
So at the risk of being like an uptight ass, and although there likely 
won't be any reasonable usefulness out of it, I will consider myself 
personally offended if you, Kris, don't properly reply to this one:

Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> kris wrote:
>>
>> Indeed; and it may come as a shocking surprise that you're not the 
>> only one aware of some OOP fragilities. However, you paint a heavily 
>> lopsided picture since you're either blind to the other issues or 
>> choose to be sly about not mentioning them. So, though you're trying 
>> to force this into an NG discussion, Bruno, it's already done with 
>> until Walter asks for opinions.
>>
>> Good luck with your exams.
> 
> Ok, seriously, this comment about the "other issues" I'm "either blind" 
> or "choose to be sly about not mentioning them" has particularly annoyed 
> me. I already stated that "#2 and #3 are clearly a bug", and then gave a 
> short sentence why. What more would you like me to say and discuss about 
> this other issues?! Again, this is not a rhetorical question, please 
> answer, clarify me, why I'm being blind and sly about these other 
> issues, and what more should I have said about them.
> 



-- 
Bruno Medeiros - CS/E student
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D