[Bug 64] Unhandled errors should go to stderr

Don Clugston dac at nospam.com.au
Thu Mar 23 02:55:18 PST 2006


d-bugmail at puremagic.com wrote:
> http://d.puremagic.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64
> 
> ------- Comment #2 from smjg at iname.com  2006-03-23 04:22 -------
> Sorry, I was thinking of it as silent generation of bad code, which Walter once
> suggested should count as critical.  Should've finished reading that discussion
> I guess....

Silent generation of bad code is a thousand times more serious than a 
memory leak, or even a segfault (after all, it could potentially cause 
segfaults in thousands of apps!). I really think the categories for a 
compiler are fundamentally different from those for any other type of 
application.

I'm not sure that this particular issue is bad code generation though. 
And certainly not a P1. Since D is currently usable, a P1 can only apply 
to a regression.




More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list