Conditional ? bug

[Max Samuha]

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 13:51:21 +0200, Tydr Schnubbis <fake at address.dude>
wrote:

>Max Samuha wrote:
>> class Test
>> {
>> 	int foo()
>> 	{
>> 		return 1;
>> 	}
>> }
>> 
>> void main()
>> {
>> 	Test test = null;
>> 	int i = test != null ? test.foo() : 0;
>> }
>> 
>> This throws access violation exception
>
> From http://www.digitalmars.com/d/expression.html#EqualExpression :
>
>"For class and struct objects, the expression (a == b)  is rewritten as 
>a.opEquals(b), and (a != b) is rewritten as !a.opEquals(b)."
>
>So you have to use "test != null ? test.foo() : 0" for that kind of 
>thing.  Just "test ? test.foo() : 0" works too.

Sorry, my fault. I should have used !is or simply test. Thanks