d1.0blocker - anyone at home?

[Stewart Gordon]

There have been a number of independent attempts to round up what is
needed before we are ready for 1.0:

- pending peeves
- various posts on the 'groups giving opinions on the criteria
- various posts on the 'groups criticising the amount of pretence that
1.0 is around the corner
- most recently, the d1.0blocker flag in Bugzilla.

However, it seems that nobody else, not even Walter, has caught on to
the fact that we have d1.0blocker.  So far, I'm the only one who's
nominated anything for d1.0blocker status.

We need more people to nominate 1.0 blockers - whether by nominating
existing issues filed in Bugzilla or by filing new issues and nominating
them.  Complier bugs that really need fixing, Phobos bugs that really
need fixing, corners of the spec waiting to be implemented, errors in
the spec, ambiguities in the spec, inconsistencies in the spec, bits of
the spec that that don't make sense, whatever else you can think of.

Come on - let's get nominating!

Stewart.

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/M d- s:-@ C++@ a->--- UB@ P+ L E@ W++@ N+++ o K-@ w++@ O? M V? PS-
PE- Y? PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++++ h-- r-- !y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on
the 'group where everyone may benefit.