d1.0blocker - anyone at home?

[Kyle Furlong]

Juan Jose Comellas wrote:
> Stewart Gordon wrote:
> 
>> There have been a number of independent attempts to round up what is
>> needed before we are ready for 1.0:
>>
>> - pending peeves
>> - various posts on the 'groups giving opinions on the criteria
>> - various posts on the 'groups criticising the amount of pretence that
>> 1.0 is around the corner
>> - most recently, the d1.0blocker flag in Bugzilla.
>>
>> However, it seems that nobody else, not even Walter, has caught on to
>> the fact that we have d1.0blocker.  So far, I'm the only one who's
>> nominated anything for d1.0blocker status.
>>
>> We need more people to nominate 1.0 blockers - whether by nominating
>> existing issues filed in Bugzilla or by filing new issues and nominating
>> them.  Complier bugs that really need fixing, Phobos bugs that really
>> need fixing, corners of the spec waiting to be implemented, errors in
>> the spec, ambiguities in the spec, inconsistencies in the spec, bits of
>> the spec that that don't make sense, whatever else you can think of.
>>
>> Come on - let's get nominating!
>>
>> Stewart.
>>
> 
> It looks like a special permission is needed to mark a bug as a d1.0blocker.
> I just tried it and it failed for me.
> 

Likewise.

-- 
Kyle Furlong // Physics Undergrad, UCSB

"D is going wherever the D community wants it to go." - Walter Bright