Odd delegate behavior

[nobody]

Frits van Bommel wrote:
> nobody wrote:
>> When I compile (v1.0) the following code for some reason opIndexDg's 
>> stack pointer is null and opIndexAssignDg's stack pointer is not.
>>
>> ----------------
> [snip]
>>       printf("    stack -> [%X]\n", opIndexDg.ptr );
> [snip]
>>       printf("          stack -> [%X]\n", &opIndexAssignDg.ptr );
>                                             ^ You have an extra '&' here
> 
> If you remove that it should also be null (it was for me).
> The address you were printing was where the null pointer was stored, not 
> the null pointer itself :P.

Thanks that certainly was just a typo on my part!