[Issue 1069] No error on type mismatch with varargs

Sean Kelly sean at f4.ca
Mon Mar 19 13:51:09 PDT 2007


d-bugmail at puremagic.com wrote:
>
> What you're seeing is an unfortunate side-effect of the combination of lazy
> [void delegate()] arguments with the fact that a function name doesn't evaluate
> to a pointer/delegate to that function but to its return value (i.e. property
> syntax).

And here I thought lazy parameters had to be marked 'lazy'.  That's 
annoying.  Thanks :-)


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list