[Issue 1466] New: Spec claims maximal munch technique always works: not for "1..3"

[Chris Nicholson-Sauls]

BCS wrote:
> Reply to d-bugmail at puremagic.com,
> 
> 
>> "The source text is split into tokens using the maximal munch
>> technique, i.e., the lexical analyzer tries to make the longest token
>> it can."
>>
> 
> another case:
> 
> actual
> !isGood -> ! isGood
> MaxMunch
> !isGood -> !is Good
> 
> 

I might be wrong, but my guess is that 'is' is always treated as its own entity, so that 
'!is' is really ('!' 'is').  Its not a bad practice when one has keyword-operators to do 
this, to avoid MM screwing up user's identifiers.  But, as I haven't taken any trips 
through the DMD frontend source, I might be completely off.

-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls