[Issue 1466] Spec claims maximal munch technique always works: not for "1..3"

Matti Niemenmaa see_signature at for.real.address
Mon Sep 10 05:10:22 PDT 2007

Previous message: [Issue 1466] Spec claims maximal munch technique always works: not for "1..3"
Next message: [Issue 1460] Compiler crash on valid code
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jascha Wetzel wrote:
<snip>
> but that should be stated in the specs, of course.

Exactly, which is what the bug is about. :-)

-- 
E-mail address: matti.niemenmaa+news, domain is iki (DOT) fi

Previous message: [Issue 1466] Spec claims maximal munch technique always works: not for "1..3"
Next message: [Issue 1460] Compiler crash on valid code
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list