[Issue 632] Typedef/enum promotions spec ambiguous - ultimate base type or lowest common denominator?
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Wed Dec 31 09:27:58 PST 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=632
smjg at iname.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Typedef promotions spec |Typedef/enum promotions spec
|ambiguous - ultimate base |ambiguous - ultimate base
|type or lowest common |type or lowest common
|denominator? |denominator?
------- Comment #1 from smjg at iname.com 2008-12-31 11:27 -------
Issue 633 has been reduced to this one. Whatever the spec is fixed to say, it
must also avoid any ambiguity in what happens when mixed enum/typedef chains
are involved. This will only be an issue if the ultimate base type route is
chosen - going by lowest common denominator naturally addresses this.
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list