[Issue 2389] void* vs. object type overloading fails for null
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Fri Oct 3 22:56:17 PDT 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2389
bugzilla at digitalmars.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Comment #1 from bugzilla at digitalmars.com 2008-10-04 00:56 -------
null is not a simple void* like it is in C. It exact matches several different
types, including objects and void*. Hence the ambiguity.
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list