[Issue 2389] void* vs. object type overloading fails for null

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Fri Oct 3 22:56:17 PDT 2008


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2389


bugzilla at digitalmars.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




------- Comment #1 from bugzilla at digitalmars.com  2008-10-04 00:56 -------
null is not a simple void* like it is in C. It exact matches several different
types, including objects and void*. Hence the ambiguity.


-- 



More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list