[Issue 2367] Overloading error

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sat Sep 20 15:49:21 PDT 2008


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2367





------- Comment #3 from jarrett.billingsley at gmail.com  2008-09-20 17:49 -------
Amen to dropping the fixed-sizedness of string literals.  I suppose determining
the type based on the smallest type that can represent the data without using
multibyte encodings is reasonable enough, and you're right, it fits in with the
way it works for ints.


-- 



More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list