[Issue 302] in/out contract inheritance yet to be implemented

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=302


clugdbug at yahoo.com.au changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |spec




------- Comment #5 from clugdbug at yahoo.com.au  2009-04-22 08:25 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> The spec specifies what the code should do, but the code being generated does
> something else. How is that not the very definition of wrong-code?
> (This probably falls in the "the front-end is sending incorrect data to
> the backend" category)
> 
> Never having been implemented doesn't change any of this, IMHO.

I think the problem is in the spec in this case. When it's not implemented, it
should either marked as not yet implemented in DMD, or it shouldn't be in the
spec at all yet. _Every_ other case of wrong-code in bugzilla is different.
The nature of the issue is completely different, so I really think it's
unhelpful to use the same keyword for both.


--