[Issue 302] in/out contract inheritance yet to be implemented

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Fri Apr 24 06:14:42 PDT 2009


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=302





------- Comment #10 from maxmo at pochta.ru  2009-04-24 08:14 -------
He rejected to call in contract by caller, because it obviously should be
called by callee.

ps yeah, checking this contract before super contract is better :)


-- 



More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list