[Issue 4621] Destructors are inherently un- at safe

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4621


nfxjfg at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |nfxjfg at gmail.com


--- Comment #8 from nfxjfg at gmail.com 2010-08-12 06:20:27 PDT ---
*facepalm*

C# and Java have safe finalizers. There's nothing that stops you rewriting the
finalization part in gcx.d to make it safe. The only real issue is that
finalizers are not deterministic (unsolvable) and that finalizers are invoked
in an arbitrary context (solvable if you'd create a finalization worker thread
or so).

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------