[Issue 5370] New: Memory corruption in std.outbuffer, attrubute NO_SCAN not cleared
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Fri Dec 24 09:03:14 PST 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5370
Summary: Memory corruption in std.outbuffer, attrubute NO_SCAN
not cleared
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nobody at puremagic.com
ReportedBy: dmitry.olsh at gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh at gmail.com> 2010-12-24 09:01:12 PST ---
OutBuffer class in std.outbuffer used to support storing pointers inside.
Now underliying array is not scanned for roots, maybe it has something to do
with array appending cache.
This shows the problem:
import std.outbuffer,std.stdio;
import core.memory;
int*[] f(){
auto outb = new OutBuffer;
for(int i=0;i<1024;++i){
int* p = new int;
*p = i;
outb.write(cast(size_t)p);
}
return cast(int*[])outb.toBytes();
}
void main(){
GC.disable();
auto arr = f();
assert(arr.length == 1024);
assert(*arr[42] == 42);
//size: 0 bits 0 - indicates that arr.ptr isn't start of block?
writefln("Size %d bits %d",GC.sizeOf(arr.ptr),GC.getAttr(arr.ptr));
//GC.collect();//uncomment to get an assertion failure
for(int i =0;i<1024;++i){
auto p = new int;
*p = 0xdeadbeef;
}
assert(*arr[42] == 42); //this fails with GC.collect
}
Looking into outbuffer.d, the likely culprit is:
line(84): GC.clrAttr(data.ptr, GC.BlkAttr.NO_SCAN);
which isn't working.
Patch for std.outbuffer, changes array type to void[] and removes this hack:
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
class OutBuffer
{
- ubyte data[];
+ void data[];
uint offset;
invariant()
@@ -52,10 +52,10 @@
}
/*********************************
- * Convert to array of bytes.
+ * Convert to array
*/
- ubyte[] toBytes() { return data[0 .. offset]; }
+ void[] toBytes() { return data[0 .. offset]; }
/***********************************
* Preallocate nbytes more to the size of the internal buffer.
@@ -81,7 +81,6 @@
if (data.length < offset + nbytes)
{
data.length = (offset + nbytes) * 2;
- GC.clrAttr(data.ptr, GC.BlkAttr.NO_SCAN);
}
}
@@ -109,7 +108,7 @@
void write(ubyte b) /// ditto
{
reserve(ubyte.sizeof);
- this.data[offset] = b;
+ *cast(ubyte *)&data[offset] = b;
offset += ubyte.sizeof;
}
@@ -183,7 +182,7 @@
void write(OutBuffer buf) /// ditto
{
- write(buf.toBytes());
+ write(cast(ubyte[])buf.toBytes());
}
/****************************************
@@ -193,7 +192,7 @@
void fill0(uint nbytes)
{
reserve(nbytes);
- data[offset .. offset + nbytes] = 0;
+ *cast(ubyte*)&data[offset .. offset + nbytes] = 0;
offset += nbytes;
}
@@ -331,7 +330,7 @@
for (uint i = offset; i > index; )
{
--i;
- data[i + nbytes] = data[i];
+ *cast(ubyte*)&data[i + nbytes] = *cast(ubyte*)&data[i];
}
offset += nbytes;
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list