[Issue 3155] LDC2 support for druntime

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155


Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |braddr at puremagic.com


--- Comment #5 from Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> 2010-02-09 11:04:04 PST ---
A separate runtime per compiler seems very wrong to me.

I can understand that the current code bases look fairly far apart due to the
length of time they've been allowed to drift, but really, shouldn't they be
very very similar for the vast majority of the code?

I recognize that ldc has introduced additional compiler emited function calls,
but there's no reason that those can't be included in druntime.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------