[Issue 3362] crippling lack of 64-bit support

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3362


Don <clugdbug at yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


--- Comment #3 from Don <clugdbug at yahoo.com.au> 2010-01-18 11:53:44 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> We do use bugzilla to track enhancement requests though, so re-opening.

Come on, it's NOT an enhancement request. That's a request for a complete new
backend! There are two possible responses: INVALID, or WONTFIX. I think it's
invalid, because of the availability of LDC. Seriously, it's a bugzilla report
of no value, and including these kind of things reduces the value of bugzilla.

BTW, while you're here, we need to change the 'version' specifiers. There
should be D1 only, D2 only, and both. The current list of 100 different
versions causes lots of problems, and adds _no_ value. None. More importantly
it gives no way of specifying D1-only bugs.
Could you add: D1, D2, D1-only, to the existing list, so we can migrate them
across?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------