[Issue 1351] Discrepancies in the language specification

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1351



--- Comment #11 from Ellery Newcomer <ellery-newcomer at utulsa.edu> 2010-06-14 10:44:58 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=661)
adds links, fixes productions, adjusts some formatting

No claims to infallibility. In particular, someone had better check
PowExpression, as I believe it was in the wrong place and I moved it, but I'm
not so confident about it.

Aziz: for DeclaratorSuffixes, the [ exp .. exp ] syntax is not currently
supported by dmd (v2 at least), and it probably never was, and I don't think it
should be. (of course I don't think DeclaratorSuffixes should exist at all,
except for the parameter part, since it's a kludge for c-style types)

I haven't touched NewExpression, Protection, or SwitchStatement (at least I
don't think I did)

IsExpression: I hate D. How about we just pretend this one doesn't exist?

I think everything else either is already fixed or is fixed by this patch

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------