[Issue 859] Improve compiler inlining

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sun Jun 27 20:01:37 PDT 2010


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=859



--- Comment #5 from Leandro Lucarella <llucax at gmail.com> 2010-06-27 20:01:35 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> @Leandro Lucarella: ldc seems to inline the predicate just fine, although the
> generated code is still slightly different.

Yes, LDC is better at inlining because it doesn't use the front-end inlining
code, it let the LLVM optimizer do the job instead (I think they inhibited the
DMDFE inliner precisely because of this issues).

This bug report is about the DMD implementation.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list