[Issue 3943] "in" function argument is redundant

Sat Mar 13 00:10:55 PST 2010

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3943

Mike Parker <aldacron at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aldacron at gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Mike Parker <aldacron at gmail.com> 2010-03-13 00:10:54 PST ---
I strongly object. Currently, 'in' is one of the few constructs remaining that
allow compatibility between D1 and D2 without resorting to versioned blocks and
mixins. Take this away, and cross-version compatibility becomes even more of a
headache than it already is.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------