[Issue 2656] Require 0o format for octal literals

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sat Mar 13 07:01:55 PST 2010


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2656



--- Comment #10 from Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at metalanguage.com> 2010-03-13 07:01:53 PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I agree that the "0o" prefix is not very readable.
> 
> What about using Octal!50 instead (no leading zero. No string)?

Unfortunately that would preclude expressing large numbers in octal.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list