[Issue 5129] More strict 'abstract' management

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5129



--- Comment #4 from bearophile_hugs at eml.cc 2010-10-30 14:59:30 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Not sure, but I remember one case (far post dmd 1.000) where dmd silently
> accepted a function without body as member of an abstract class, while it
> caused linker errors on LDC.

Very often when things aren't defined & enforced in a tidy way, sooner or later
you will have some troubles. Compared to the Java compiler DMD is incredibly
sloppy, and this will probably cause some troubles later.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------