[Issue 4458] Static typing for format strings, when possible

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Mon Feb 28 11:03:25 PST 2011


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4458


Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jmdavisProg at gmx.com


--- Comment #8 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> 2011-02-28 11:00:31 PST ---
_Any_ output to the console is going to be inefficent. And the benefits of
writeln _far_ outweigh any possible degredation in performance in comparison to
writeln. And personally, I have _rarely_ had problems with writeln. I just use
%s all of the time, and it works. If you actually need to use a format
specifier other than %s, it's not exactly strenuous to be required to be
careful about it - especially if it's a rare event. You're still no worse of
than you are with printf. I really think that this is a non-issue.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list