[Issue 1449] deprecated methods are counted as interface implementation

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Thu Jun 16 06:01:31 PDT 2011


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1449


Stewart Gordon <smjg at iname.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


--- Comment #8 from Stewart Gordon <smjg at iname.com> 2011-06-16 05:56:48 PDT ---
I agree with Bearophile.  Moreover, as I see it, a hole in the deprecation
system constitutes a bug, just as most of us seem to agree that a hole in the
const/immutable system (of which there are many) constitutes a bug.

(In reply to comment #5)
> Bugzilla is not a sanctuary for ideas.  It is a list of issues with the
> language to be fixed, and possible enhancements to be either incorporated into
> the language or rejected.

How is this not an issue with the language to be fixed?
If it isn't an issue with the language to be fixed, how is it not a possible
enhancement to be either incorporated into the language or rejected?

> That being said, I am careful about closing issues.  There is no valid bug
> anywhere in this report.  As far as I know this is not a commonly reported
> complaint 

Commonness of reporting is not a criterion for the validity of a bug.

> nor is there any proposal that would change this behavior.  It's
> simply invalid.

No it isn't.

And even those that are invalid should, where it makes sense to do so, have
their levels changed to "enhancement" rather than just closed.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list