[Issue 3581] "private" attribute breaks "override"

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3581



--- Comment #10 from Vladimir <thecybershadow at gmail.com> 2011-03-01 16:25:18 PST ---
Can "protected" replace "private" in all intended usage of virtual private
functions? If so, has it been considered to simply forbid virtual private
functions (with a warning or error)? Then programmers should clarify whether
they need NVI, or a non-virtual, inlinable private function (by adding
"final").

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------