[Issue 8599] Link time error when class's method are defined without body and nothing is abstract
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Wed Aug 29 14:00:36 PDT 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8599
Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> 2012-08-29 14:00:34 PDT ---
abstract is never inferred. Why would it be inferred? Functions are only
abstract if marked abstract.
And if a function is not abstract, then it needs a body/definition, so obviousy
it's going to fail at link time when the linker doesn't find a definition for
it. It's perfectly legal to declare a function without giving its body as long
as the linker has the body. That's how .di files work. It's also useful with
stuff like version(D_Ddoc) where there is no definition and shouldn't be one.
This isn't a bug.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list