[Issue 7265] Function Literals where a keyword was omitted should be delegate even if inference.
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Mon Jan 16 09:25:17 PST 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7265
Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at metalanguage.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |andrei at metalanguage.com
--- Comment #4 from Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at metalanguage.com> 2012-01-16 09:25:15 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Everything behaves as specified in TDPL. This is not a compiler bug.
Yah, I just tested this:
import std.stdio, std.traits;
void main()
{
auto fn = { writeln("function"); };
static assert(isFunctionPointer!(typeof(fn)));
int x;
auto dg = { writeln("delegate because it prints ", x); };
static assert(isDelegate!(typeof(dg)));
}
So the literal is properly classified as a function or delegate depending on it
needing a frame pointer or not.
There's one remaining question I have. I rewrote the example like this:
import std.stdio, std.traits;
void main()
{
auto fn = { writeln("function"); };
static assert(is(typeof(fn) == function));
int x;
auto dg = { writeln("delegate because it prints ", x); };
static assert(is(typeof(dg) == delegate));
}
The second static assert works, but the first doesn't. Why?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list