[Issue 7019] implicit constructors are inconsistently allowed
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Thu Jan 26 10:39:06 PST 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7019
Vladimir Panteleev <thecybershadow at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |thecybershadow at gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Panteleev <thecybershadow at gmail.com> 2012-01-26 10:39:05 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I vote for doing the opposite of C++ and introducing a @implicit tag for
> constructors that are to be used in the fashion I depicted.
If we had opImplicitCast (for implicit casting of "this" to another type), this
could have been named opImplicitCast_r (for implicit casting of another type to
typeof(this)).
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list