[Issue 926] Revival of implicit conversion from Derived[] to Base[] not noted in changelog

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=926


Stewart Gordon <smjg at iname.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |
         AssignedTo|bugzilla at digitalmars.com    |smjg at iname.com


--- Comment #7 from Stewart Gordon <smjg at iname.com> 2012-01-30 08:55:26 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)

> What matters is what the spec says and what the compiler does now. If someone
> wants to go through the compiler/spec diffs from years ago to see when things
> changed, that's fine and I'll fold in changelog changes if they present them,

The standard meaning of WONTFIX is "this issue is to stay as it is" not "I
personally can't be bothered/don't have time to deal with it".  The way to
indicate the latter is to leave it open and reassign it to nobody - this shows
that it's free for anybody to take the issue and work on it.

Here's an idea: I'll have a look at it myself over the next few days.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------