[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Tue Jul 10 15:47:37 PDT 2012


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857



--- Comment #83 from Stewart Gordon <smjg at iname.com> 2012-07-10 15:47:32 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #82)
> (In reply to comment #81)
>> But no use case I can see for using a C-style variadic for a D class method.
> 
> I dunno, maybe you want to pass the args on to vprintf or something...  Does it
> really matter?

I'd got the impression that D-style variadics are directly compatible in that
respect.  But if D-style variadics were something more structured, I can see
that passing them to a C variadic function would be trivial.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list