[Issue 8381] Uniform function call syntax (pseudo member) enhancement suggestions
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Thu Jul 12 10:23:57 PDT 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8381
deadalnix <deadalnix at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |deadalnix at gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from deadalnix <deadalnix at gmail.com> 2012-07-12 10:23:56 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > - The rule is non-obvious. How could a new developer possibly guess that this
> > happens?
>
> You could also argue that it's not obvious that:
> var.func(arg);
>
> ...can "transform" itself into:
> func(var, arg);
>
> I don't think it's that much different to transform:
> MyType.func(arg);
>
> ...into:
> func!(MyType)(arg);
>
This is the most obvious way to transform that.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list