[Issue 8220] invalid function call not detected during semantic analysis

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8220



--- Comment #11 from klickverbot <code at klickverbot.at> 2012-06-21 14:46:24 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > This example has been around a long time, and I've been telling people that
> > that's the way to do it. I'm really reluctant to break it,
> 
> The behaviour must be fixed for __traits(compiles,...), but not necessarily for
> typeof.

I think this would be opening a very big can of worms, because is(typeof(…))
has been equivalent to __traits(compiles, …) so far (well, for things that have
a type).

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------