[Issue 8993] Implement unique references/isolated memory

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sat Nov 10 10:41:34 PST 2012


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8993



--- Comment #8 from Sönke Ludwig <sludwig at outerproduct.org> 2012-11-10 10:38:42 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> 
> > I agree with what you say.
> 
> But in the end this enhancement request is not enough. A detailed DEP is
> probably necessary. You don't have to write it down all yourself, of course.
> Once the DEP is written, you will be in a better position to rant :-)

Agreed, a DIP is probably in order for this change. It would probably be enough
to concentrate on the simple parts first (implicit isolated->immutable
conversion and free psasing of isolated values between threads) and then
implement further relaxations bit by bit (e.g. implicit scoped
isolated->writable->isolated conversion). Allocating time for a proper DIP is
difficult for me currently, but I guess it could be marked as work-in-progress
in the wiki so that it can be completed step by step?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list