[Issue 3850] Signed/unsigned bytes type name

[Daniel Kozak]

On Tuesday, 23 October 2012 at 20:04:08 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 October 2012 at 16:32:38 UTC, 
> bearophile_hugs at eml.cc wrote:
>> And to represent those indexes I used a
>> sbyte instead of a ubyte because I have used -1 to represent 
>> "missing value").
>
> You still have to use 0xFF :-). But yes, I understand, that 
> sbyte and ubyte is better way, how to solve this issue.

s/have to/can/