[Issue 9616] SortedRange should support all range kinds
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Thu Feb 28 15:50:29 PST 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9616
bearophile_hugs at eml.cc changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bearophile_hugs at eml.cc
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_hugs at eml.cc 2013-02-28 15:50:26 PST ---
I have converted this to an enhancement request, if that's OK.
Is this ER vaguely related to this question I have asked?
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/zmiqbifxevljazceowif@forum.dlang.org
If SortedRange supports Input Ranges too, then group(SortedRange) is able to be
a SortedRange.
But unfortunately if you apply an array on that lazy SortedRange, you get an
array and you lose the SortedRange quality.
In my code I'd like to perform a binary search on the result of a
"sort.group.array". Currently I have to use "sort.group.array.assumeSorted".
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list