[Issue 6856] Absence of in() contract (precondition) should mean "use default precondition" instead of "ignore inherited in() contracts"

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6856


Stewart Gordon <smjg at iname.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement


--- Comment #28 from Stewart Gordon <smjg at iname.com> 2013-01-21 16:42:41 PST ---
Not sure why this wasn't flagged as INVALID before.  But now that the summary
line's changed and some comments to the effect of it have been posted, it's
essentially an enhancement request.  But it'll probably be rejected because the
code breakage that would result.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------