[Issue 10226] core.simd bad codegen
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Mon Jun 3 09:46:26 PDT 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10226
bearophile_hugs at eml.cc changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bearophile_hugs at eml.cc
--- Comment #5 from bearophile_hugs at eml.cc 2013-06-03 09:46:24 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> On modern processors unaligned loads come at almost no penalty, and it is a lot
> easier to use unaligned loads within a highly optimized functions compared to
> making all the data in the whole project 16 byte aligned and use aligned loads.
If this is true then is it worth reducing the smallest allocation size of the D
garbage collector from 16 bytes to 8 bytes and reduce the alignment to 8 bytes?
This saves some memory when you allocate many small objects, like small tree
nodes.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list