[Issue 4092] broken memory management for COM objects derived from IUnknown

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Fri Sep 27 07:11:22 PDT 2013


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4092



--- Comment #7 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> 2013-09-27 07:11:21 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Can a a synchronized block be used instead?

Actually `atomicOp!"+="(count, 1)` could be used as well, no?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list