[Issue 12656] Some functions in std.ascii can be @nogc

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12656

--- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to bearophile_hugs from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrej Mitrovic from comment #2)
> 
> > I wish we implemented @nogc semantics before marking everything as @nogc.
> > Without proper semantic cecks now, what's going to happen is we're going to
> > have a million errors *after* everything is marked as @nogc at the moment
> > @nogc semantics are properly implemented.
> 
> I don't fully understand your points. Now @nogc semantics is already 80%
> implemented. What's missing is stuff like Issue 12642, that Walter so far
> has not commented on.

Sorry, I was under the impression the semantics weren't in place. That's what
I've read in the nogc pulls. Maybe things changed since then (a lot of changes
go through every day). Disregard my rambling if I'm wrong.

--