[Issue 3396] Call of abstract method not detected by semantic check

via Digitalmars-d-bugs digitalmars-d-bugs at puremagic.com
Tue Aug 12 05:07:46 PDT 2014


https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3396

--- Comment #14 from yebblies <yebblies at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Stewart Gordon from comment #12)
> http://dlang.org/function.html
> "Functions without bodies:
> 
> int foo();
> 
> that are not declared as abstract are expected to have their implementations
> elsewhere, and that implementation will be provided at the link step."
> 
> Where does the spec indicate that functions that _are_ declared as abstract
> can also have their implementations elsewhere?

Where does it say that they can't?

--


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list