[Issue 3396] Call of abstract method not detected by semantic check

via Digitalmars-d-bugs digitalmars-d-bugs at puremagic.com
Tue Aug 12 10:50:26 PDT 2014


https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3396

--- Comment #15 from Stewart Gordon <smjg at iname.com> ---
(In reply to yebblies from comment #14) 
> Where does it say that they can't?

If such code is legal, the spec needs to explain its semantics somewhere.

--


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list