[Issue 13728] std.conv.to for POD structs

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13728

--- Comment #3 from bearophile_hugs at eml.cc ---
(In reply to John Colvin from comment #2)
> Why not non-POD structs and classes too?

To keep this Enhancement simple and well defined. Further extensions and
enhancements are possible later.


> Also, what do you think about situations where only a few of the members are
> set:
> 
> struct A { int a, b, c; }
> auto a = A(3, 4);
> 
> is completely valid, but would you want to allow
> 
> auto a = [3, 4].to!A;
> 
> ?

Seems possible, but also adds complexity to the proposal, so better to keep
things simple at first.

--