[Issue 11833] std.process: ddoc warnings

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11833


Vladimir Panteleev <thecybershadow at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |thecybershadow at gmail.com


--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Panteleev <thecybershadow at gmail.com> 2014-02-12 03:00:23 EET ---
These are caused by, arguably, a compiler deficiency: the compiler does not
consider all of a function's overloads, documented together with "/// ditto",
when generating these warnings. So, it is complaining about arguments that do
not exist in the first overload (the one immediately below the DDoc in
question), but do exist in its ditto-annotated overloads.

This can probably be closed as a duplicate of whichever issue documents said
compiler deficiency.

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------