[Issue 12150] Regression (2.063): char[] implicitly converts to string in .dup expression
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Thu Feb 13 07:42:52 PST 2014
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12150
Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #7 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> 2014-02-13 07:42:50 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I might be missing something, but where is the regression? The example you
> posted doesn't seem to be a regression because char[] isn't implicitly
> convertible to either `string` or `ubyte[]`, so surely the code would simply
> not compile.
Ah I thought it would compile, after I added an explicit cast to avoid the
recursive call it ended up compiling, but it wouldn't otherwise even though I
thought it would. So you're right.
There's no regression here. The below test-case works properly:
-----
int foo(string arg)
{
return foo(arg.dup); // calls second overload
}
int foo(char[] b)
{
assert(0);
}
void main()
{
auto x = foo("");
}
-----
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list