[Issue 11881] -betterC switch suffers from bit rot

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Wed Jan 8 06:03:25 PST 2014


https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11881


yebblies <yebblies at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |yebblies at gmail.com


--- Comment #9 from yebblies <yebblies at gmail.com> 2014-01-09 01:03:18 EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> int 3 might be a better choice, even in kernel mode that's a debugging trap,
> and it is also a one byte instruction on x86 (0xCC). I'd say either do that or
> continue to generate a call to a runtime function, but just use _d_assert
> without the moduleinfo argument instead of _d_assertm.
> 

I think still calling _d_assertm is a good idea.

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list