[Issue 14780] Non-intuitive behavior for pointers to aggregates defining opSlice

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14780

ag0aep6g at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ag0aep6g at gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from ag0aep6g at gmail.com ---
Currently, operator overloads don't go through pointers. I.e., this isn't
unique to opSlice.

Only letting opSlice go through pointers would be silly, in my opinion. Doing
it for all operators would be quite a change and should be well thought out.

--